Comment
NICK TIMOTHY

Ministers need to face down the rebels in Parliament and tell Brussels we do not seek a customs union

WILL Brexit, as the Prime Minister’s phrase goes, really mean Brexit? We will soon find out, because we are reaching a crucial moment as Britain prepares to leave the European Union.

Behind closed doors in government and Parliament, two fierce battles are raging, and both are about Britain’s future trading relationships with the EU and the rest of the world.

Advertisement
No deal may be better than accepting a bad deal

The first is about the decision ministers must make on the future customs relationship we establish with Europe after Brexit. The second is an attempt by MPs and peers — regardless of what ministers decide — to impose on the Government the very solution Theresa May has already rejected: they want Britain to form a customs union with the European Union.

At first, this might sound appealing. It would mean no tariffs on goods traded between Britain and the EU, no routine customs checks at the border, and less hassle for firms doing business in Europe. But there are significant downsides. We would stay tied to the EU, because a customs union would mean having to sign up to European rules and regulations, over which we would have no say.

And we would be unable to sign our own trade agreements with other countries, so we would not make the most of one of Brexit’s key advantages.But a customs union with the EU — when we are no longer members of the EU — brings an even bigger problem.It would allow the European Commission, in its own negotiations, to give away trading access to Britain without getting the same access to other countries for our firms.

This is what they do to ­Turkey, which is the only big country to agree even a partial customs union with Europe. The Turks are not allowed to negotiate trade agreements with other countries unless the EU has reached its own deal first.

Advertisement
, says, it would help avoid a hard border in Northern Ireland. And it would minimise bureaucracy and limit new barriers to trade with Europe. But it would also guarantee Britain could pursue an independent trade policy and strike trade agreements with the world’s fastest- growing economies.

MOST READ IN OPINION

THE SUN SAYS
Broken system failed Sara Sharif - monster father should have been removed
LEO McKINSTRY
The irresponsible trade unions are sewing discontent for their own ends
ROD LIDDLE
Press watchdog rules you can't tell truth if it might hurt someone’s feelings
THE SUN SAYS
So-called human rights lawyer Phil Shiner is a wicked crook, a thief & a liar

If we are still in a customs union, however, and unable to adopt an independent trade policy, many will conclude that we have not truly left the EU. And that will have enormous political consequences.

Advertisement

So rebel Conservative MPs need to be careful what they wish for. A partial Brexit would almost certainly see the next election fought on a need to “finish the job”. It would see the future of the Conservative Party dominated by Britain’s relationship with the EU.  And it would surely mean Theresa May’s successor will be an advocate of a clean break.

That is surely not what Remainers want. For Britain to make the most of Brexit, for our new relationship with Europe to be sustainable, and for the Tories to focus on vital economic and social reforms, Brexit really must mean Brexit — ministers and MPs must reject the customs union.

PM Theresa May promises more money for NHS and schools after Brexit
Topics
Advertisement
machibet777.com