‘Sex with foot-licking fetishist Prince Andrew was the longest 10 minutes of my life’, claims Virginia Roberts
HAVING sex with foot-licking fetishist Prince Andrew was the “longest ten minutes of my life”, a Jeffrey Epstein sex slave has claimed.
Virginia Roberts Giuffre who alleges she was trafficked to the Duke for sex aged 17, includes the lurid allegation in her manuscript that was unsealed along with other court documents by a judge in New York last week.
Claiming Andrew had a foot-licking fetish, Roberts said he "was adorning my young body, particularly my feet, caressing my toes and licking my arches".
But she expressed relief that Andrew hadn't asked her to lick his own feet.
"I drew a line with extreme fetishes, especially ones that would involve my tongue and feet in the same sentence.
Describing the rest of the alleged encounter, Roberts said: "It wasn't hard to get him wound up to the point where he just wanted to have the rest of me so we dried off from the cold and retired to my bedchambers for the longest ten minutes of my life."
"Moments later and without any real emotional attachment, he burst in ecstasy, leaving me to my own feelings of dismay.
"As relieved as I was to see the experience come to pass with him, it was finally sinking in that I would never be anything more than but a muse."
Roberts goes on to recount her conversations with Epstein following their return to the US after the alleged encounter with Prince Andrew.
Andrew's alleged foot-licking fetish made Epstein burst out laughing when she told him, she claimed.
"Jeffrey didn't want to know the grim details of how it all happened on my intimate night with the Prince, he just asked simply if I thought that I did well in keeping his friend happy," she wrote.
"Knowing already that the evaluation of my performance was already discussed between them, I just as simply replied back with a nod of approval.
"I did have a laugh with Jeffrey about the Prince's weird fixation on my feet and lets just say that he was quite tickled with Andrew's quirky obsession, having a good ol' chuckle at my eccentric encounter."
Roberts has previously claimed that she was subjected to years of abuse by Epstein and alleged madam Ghislaine Maxwell after first meeting the pair in the summer of 2000.
She says she suffered abuse by Epstein personally and was also trafficked to his powerful friends, including Prince Andrew.
The prince has "vehemently" denied any wrongdoing.
Roberts has previously recalled meeting the prince on a visit to London in 2001, and alleges that she was forced to sleep with him after returning to Maxwell's Belgravia townhouse after a night out.
She also describes how, during another meeting with the prince in New York, she and a second young woman were asked to pose on his lap for a photograph, and says the picture was intended to create "the impression girls couldn't stay away from Randy Andy".
The manuscript for the book was originally submitted to the court as part of a defamation case brought by Roberts against Maxwell in 2015 after Maxwell accused her of lying.
The case was settled in 2017 before it reached trial but, while more than 2000 pages of evidence were released, around 900 court filings remained under seal or redacted.
Roberts had requested the release of some of the documents for use in separate civil lawsuits.
Maxwell fought the release of five documents, totalling 94 pages, in particular on the grounds they contained "extremely personal” information, but Judge Loretta Preska last month ruled they should be unsealed.
Most read in News
Maxwell is currently awaiting trial on charges of enticement of minors, sex trafficking of children, and perjury over her alleged involvement in Epstein's crimes.
She also denies all wrongdoing.
READ MORE SUN STORIES
A source close to the Duke of York told the Sun Online that information emerging from the court documents should be read with caution and said that the Duke had been 'falsely accused for many years'.
They also added that those who were close to Prince Andrew knew that he would be 'exonerated and vindicated in the weeks ahead' and said the allegations made in the court papers would 'likely be highly inaccurate'.
