MEGGING A MOCKERY

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry ‘should stop sniping from the sidelines’ over Sussex Royal row, palace insider says

MEGHAN Markle and Prince Harry should stop "sniping from the sidelines" over the Sussex Royal row, palace insiders said overnight.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex were forced into an embarrassing climbdown over their trademark this week where they confirmed they would not use the word Royal after quitting the Firm.

Advertisement
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry released a lengthy statement about their future as royals on Friday nightCredit: Splash News

The essay, posted on their own Sussex Royal website, has since been slammed as "bitter" with experts saying it showed just how "unhappy" with couple were with the agreement.

And insiders told the Daily Mail: "It was their decision to do this and the family is clearly trying their best to facilitate it,

"But it inevitably requires sacrifices on both sides and the Sussexes need to be rather more gracious about it. Sniping from the sidelines doesn't help anyone."

Another added: "Let's just hope they feel they have got whatever they want to get out of their system."

Advertisement

The 1,114 word statement included a perceived dig at being treated differently from other working royals, including Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie. 

Harry and Meghan’s statement read: “While there is precedent for other titled members of the Royal Family to seek employment outside of the institution, for The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, a 12-month review period has been put in place."

The statement also made sure to point out that while no longer able to use the word royal, Prince Harry would remain sixth-in-line to the throne.

In the statement released on their website on Friday night, Meghan and Harry confirmed they would not be using the word "royal".

Advertisement

But it read: "While there is not any jurisdiction by The Monarchy or Cabinet Office over the use of the word ‘Royal’ overseas, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex do not intend to use ‘Sussex Royal’ or any iteration of the word ‘Royal’ in any territory (either within the UK or otherwise) when the transition occurs Spring 2020."

Before last night, pals said that Meghan believed there was no legal comeback for the Queen if they continued to use the term after quitting on March 31.

The claims come after the couple were forced to ditch their Sussex Royal brand when the Queen hired top lawyers to ban it.

Harry and Meghan's online statement in full

We are pleased to now be able to share with you an update on many of the details agreed at a meeting of The Royal Family in January 2020, which outlines The Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s new roles, taking effect Spring 2020. We had hoped to be allowed to share these details with you sooner (to mitigate any confusion and subsequent misreporting), but the facts below should help provide some clarification around this transition and the steps for the future.

AS AGREED AND SET OUT IN JANUARY 2020:

  • It is agreed that the commencement of the revised role of The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take effect Spring 2020 and undergo a 12 month review.
  • The Royal Family respect and understand the wish of The Duke and Duchess of Sussex to live a more independent life as a family, by removing the supposed "public interest" justification for media intrusion into their lives. They remain a valued part of Her Majesty’s family.
  • The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will become privately funded members of The Royal Family with permission to earn their own income and the ability to pursue their own private charitable interests.
  • The preference of The Duke and Duchess of Sussex was to continue to represent and support Her Majesty The Queen albeit in a more limited capacity, while not drawing on the Sovereign Grant.
  • While there is precedent for other titled members of the Royal Family to seek employment outside of the institution, for The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, a 12-month review period has been put in place.
  • Per the agreement The Duke and Duchess of Sussex understand that they are required to step back from Royal duties and not undertake representative duties on behalf of Her Majesty The Queen.
  • As agreed and set out in January, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will retain their “HRH” prefix, thereby formally remaining known as His Royal Highness The Duke of Sussex and Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Sussex. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will no longer actively use their HRH titles as they will no longer be working members of the family as of Spring 2020.
  • As the grandson of Her Majesty and second son of The Prince of Wales, Prince Harry, The Duke of Sussex remains sixth in line to the throne of The British Monarchy and the Order of Precedence is unchanged.
  • It was agreed that The Duke and Duchess will no longer be able to formally carry out "official duties" for The Queen or represent The Commonwealth, but they will, however, be allowed to maintain their patronages (including those that are classified as "royal patronages").
  • It is agreed that The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will continue to require effective security to protect them and their son.  This is based on The Duke’s public profile by virtue of being born into The Royal Family, his military service, the Duchess’ own independent profile, and the shared threat and risk level documented specifically over the last few years. No further details can be shared as this is classified information for safety reasons.
  • In relation to the military, The Duke of Sussex will retain the rank of Major, and honorary ranks of Lieutenant Commander, and Squadron Leader. During this 12-month period of review, The Duke’s official military appointments will not be used as they are in the gift of the Sovereign. No new appointments will be made to fill these roles before the 12-month review of the new arrangements is completed.
  • While per the agreement, The Duke will not perform any official duties associated with these roles, given his dedication to the military community and ten years of service he will of course continue his unwavering support to the military community in a non-official capacity. As founder of the Invictus Games, The Duke will proudly continue supporting the military community around the world through the Invictus Games Foundation and The Endeavour Fund.
  • Based on the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s desire to have a reduced role as members of The Royal Family, it was decided in January that their Institutional Office would have to be closed, given the primary funding mechanism for this official office at Buckingham Palace is from HRH The Prince of Wales. The Duke and Duchess shared this news with their team personally in January once they knew of the decision, and have worked closely with their staff to ensure a smooth transition for each of them.
  • Over the last month and a half, The Duke and Duchess have remained actively involved in this process, which has understandably been saddening for The Duke and Duchess and their loyal staff, given the closeness of Their Royal Highnesses and their dedicated team.
  • As The Duke and Duchess will no longer be considered full-time working Members of The Royal Family, it was agreed that use of the word ‘Royal’ would need to be reviewed as it pertains to organisations associated with them in this new regard. More details on this below.

ADDITIONAL DETAILS:

  • As shared in early January on this website, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex do not plan to start a "foundation", but rather intend to develop a new way to effect change and complement the efforts made by so many excellent foundations globally.
  • The creation of this non-profit entity will be in addition to their cause driven work that they remain deeply committed to. While The Duke and Duchess are focused on plans to establish a new non-profit organisation, given the specific UK government rules surrounding use of the word "Royal", it has been therefore agreed that their non-profit organisation will not utilise the name "Sussex Royal" or any other iteration of "Royal."
  • For the above reason, the trademark applications that had been filed as protective measures and that reflected the same standard trademarking requests as done for The Royal Foundation of The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, have been removed.
  • While there is not any jurisdiction by The Monarchy or Cabinet Office over the use of the word "Royal" overseas, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex do not intend to use "Sussex Royal" or any iteration of the word "Royal" in any territory (either within the UK or otherwise) when the transition occurs Spring 2020.
  • As The Duke and Duchess of Sussex continue to develop their non-profit organisation and plan for their future, we hope that you use this site as the source for factual information. In Spring 2020, their digital channels will be refreshed as they introduce the next exciting phase to you.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex eagerly await the opportunity to share more with you and greatly appreciate your support!

Advertisement

The couple are soon expected to return to the UK to complete their last royal engagements before their March 31 deadline.

The first return to royal duties for Meghan will be on March 5, with the couple heading to the Endeavour Fund awards in London.

As part of the busy six engagements in 11 days, Harry, 35, is expected to attend the opening of the Silverstone Experience - a Brit motor racing museum - with F1 legend Lewis Hamilton on March 6.

Advertisement

And the next day, he will be joined by wife Meghan, 38, for the Mountbatten Festival of Music at Royal Albert Hall.

Meghan is then set to enjoy a solo outing on March 8 when the former actress will mark International Women's Day, however details of the event are yet to be announced.

And the couple's final engagement on March 9 will see them join the Royal Family, including the Queen, for the Commonwealth Day Service at Westminster Abbey.

It comes after Harry and Meghan axed their 15 UK staff, in their surest sign they will never return to Britain to live.

Advertisement

The described this move as "saddening for The Duke and Duchess and their loyal staff" in their statement on Friday night.

MOST READ IN NEWS

SARA FAILED
From burn marks to teachers spotting bruises - 15 missed chances to save Sharif
MUM'S HEARTBREAK
It's not human to do this to your own child... monsters must die, says mum
'SHAM MARRIAGE'
Sara Sharif’s dad exploited EU rules to stay in UK before he murdered her
DRIVER SEX SHAME
Tube driver who boasted of performing sex act in cab investigated

The couple, who are currently living in an £8m mansion on Vancouver Island, have already been booted out of their Buckingham Palace office and Harry must ditch his honorary military positions for at least 12 months.

They have been allowed to keep their HRH titles but have been forced to accept that they will not use them publicly as they tout for business around the globe.

The Sussexes have already agreed to repay the £2.4million of taxpayers’ money used to refurbish their Frogmore Cottage home in Windsor and are expected to pay a commercial rent for it of about £30,000 a month.

Advertisement
The Queen has banned Meghan and Harry from using the Sussex Royal brandCredit: Reuters
But Meghan reportedly believes there is nothing stopping the couple from using the branding

'Spiteful fury'

HARRY and Meghan have shown their true colours in their latest attack on the Queen, experts said last night.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex were under fire for their lengthy personal statement moaning about being banned from using the word “royal”.

Their outburst, and hints they will carry on using it any way, was described as petulant.

Prince Charles biographer Tom Bower said: “The public is finally seeing Meghan’s true nature and motives.

"Her comments about the Queen’s decision smacks of spiteful fury. I fear it will get worse.”

Harry and Meghan also whined they were being treated differently from other family members — seen as a dig at Harry’s cousins Beatrice and Eugenie, who can call themselves Princess.

But experts say their statement is another PR disaster.

Richard Fitz­williams, international editor of Who’s Who, said: “It underlines their differences with the palace in a way that is avoidable.”

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry 'fly to Stanford University to brainstorm their new charity with professors'

 

Topics
Advertisement
machibet777.com