Exclusive
DRIVEN MAD
BBC star refused permission to build driveway for ‘bizarre reason’ – even though it’s EXACTLY the same as his neighbours
Issues have arisen because of one small front wall
A BBC star has been refused permission to build a driveway for a very "bizarre reason".
Comedian Simon Evans has branded planning laws “a joke” after he was denied permission to create the drive at his home.
3
3
3
Simon - who has appeared in BBC2's Mock the Week, Michael McIntyre’s Comedy Roadshow and other hit shows - wanted to build it so he could install an electric vehicle charging point.
His family home is surrounded by houses which have all removed walls to create driveways to park their cars.
But astonishingly Simon was refused permission to create a similar one because his home is in a Conservation Area.
The council claims all the other homes had their drives installed before 1984 - when the road in Hove, East Sussex, became a Conservation Area and subject to strict planning laws.
READ MORE ON PROPERTY
Simon, 59, a long-time favourite at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival, says he is “astonished” by the council’s inflexible position.
The comedian, who lives at the home with his wife, Kate, successfully applied to the council for permission for a dropped kerb crossover.
Local authorities even suggested a list of approved builders and materials to carry out the work.
The crossover, which cost £5,000 in total, was carried out to the exact council specifications.
Most read in Money
However, his application did not include planning permission to remove his front wall.
And when he applied for retrospective permission, Brighton & Hove City Council’s own Conservation team objected.
I'm fed up with my trashy neighbours but can't afford to build a privacy fence
Neighbours, however, backed his plans with 14 contacting the council to support his retrospective driveway application and only two objecting to it.
When his application came before the planning committee Simon said: “We feel it does not alter the character of the neighbourhood in any detrimental way, let alone the aspects of it protected by the Conservation Area.
“It does not result in a noticeable loss of the site’s historic fabric and setting, nor does it give the curtilage of the property an overdeveloped appearance, which would harm the historic character of the property.”
He was supported by Labour councillor Alison Thomson who voted to approve planning permission alongside Brighton and Hove Independent Mark Earthey.
Councillor Thomson said: “We have to be able to make changes. I don’t think this is, to my mind, [causing] significant harm.
Councillor Earthey added: “This is an incremental change that does no harm.”
But the committee voted seven to two to refuse his retrospective planning application.
It’s a joke really because a failure to move with the times is exactly what is holding back such environmental initiatives
Simon
After the decision, Simon, who also hosts GB News’ Headliners newspaper review programme, said: “Being a comedian I often return from gigs after midnight and not being able to find a parking space within half a mile of my home is miserable.
“All the houses around me all have purpose-built driveways. It doesn’t detract from the character of the road - in fact it would make them look more uniform.
“Our house is an old Victorian villa and we bought it precisely because we love its age and history.
“We have spent around £100,000 restoring it from three run-down flats into a beautiful family home, taking care to preserve all its original features.
“However I feel the council has to move with the times and be more flexible so sympathetic modernisation can allow for more eco-friendly living.
“The introduction of a driveway would allow us to install an electric charging point which will future-proof the home and help the council’s drive towards Net Zero.
"It’s a joke really because a failure to move with the times is exactly what is holding back such environmental initiatives.”
When his family moved into the house in 2011 and began renovating it, a street tree prevented Mr Evans from creating a driveway.
That changed when the tree was removed two years ago.
Green councillor Sue Shanks asked how Mr Evans had managed to gain permission for the crossover and was told that it was handled by a different team at the council.
Councillor Shanks said: “It’s a shame that council departments can’t work a bit better together. So someone gets permission then they’re also told don’t go ahead because you may not get planning permission."
Labour councillor Jacob Allen referred to the character statement from the area, written in 1984, which lamented earlier changes to the roofs and loss of gardens for the homes built in 1860.
In the application statement, Brighton & Hove City Council planners said, “There are examples of similar arrangements along Denmark Villas.
“They all result in the loss of some of the front boundary walls in lieu of car parking. Regrettably, this loss of an historic architectural feature serves to demonstrate how incremental changes can erode the historic character of street scenes in Conservation Areas.
“The historic character of these properties has been severely impacted by these works.”
READ MORE SUN STORIES
Simon and his family must now decide whether to appeal the council decision to the Secretary of State.
Brighton & Hove City Council has been contacted for comment.
What are my rights in this situation?
What can you do if your planning application is rejected?
If your application is rejected, you might be able to appeal - however, this may not always be the best idea.
If in doubt, get advice from an expert - especially if there are other examples of similar developments in the area.
To appeal, you'll need to prepare a Statement of Case.
This is a document setting out why you believe the extension should be granted in planning policy terms - an expert can help you with this, but they will charge.
This is sent along with an appeal form to the Planning Inspectorate.
This is a government body independent of your local council, which will check whether the planning authority which refused you was correct to do so.
There is normally no fee to submit a planning appeal to the Planning Inspectorate.
The main cost is the fee you'll need to give a consultant or solicitor to prepare and manage it on your behalf - the amount will depend on the case.
Topics