We tested the best slow cookers on the market – they could save you a fortune in the cost of living crisis
FORGET ready, steady, cook – this autumn is set to be season of the slow cooker.
With energy bills rising, its a tasty way to save the pennies.
Experts believe they are more energy efficient – even if they are left on a low heat all day.
The appliances are perfect for a novice cook or someone who’s constantly on the go and doesn’t want to spend too much time in the kitchen.
All you have to do is cut up a load of meat and veg, chuck it all in and leave it to stew. Couldn’t be simpler.
Slow cookers are designed to bring out the flavour of foods and make meat tender, which means they can make even the cheapest cuts taste delicious. You can bulk cook in them, too.
READ MORE ON ENERGY BILLS
But with so many models now on offer, which is the cheapest to run?
Here, Hayley Minn, tries out a range of slow cookers and reveals what each one will cost if you leave it on all day.
Morphy Richards Sear And Stew, 3.5L, £41.49
COST: 36.99p on low setting for 8 hours
THERE’S no denying this slow cooker from Morphy Richards is one of the best-looking on this list.
And it’s also the one with the least washing up involved, as you can sear and stew your meals in the same pot.
While it’s pricier compared to some of the other slow cookers, it’s the second-best when it comes to energy efficiency, at 136 watts per hour.
The cooking pot is dish-washer safe.
George at Asda, 3L, £13
COST: 39.17p on low setting for 8 hours
AT just £13 – reduced from£16 – this model is very cheap and very simple too, with just two settings of low and high.
It works perfectly well and is a great option if you are on a budget, as it costs just over 39p for eight hours of cooking on the low setting, using 144 watts per hour.
Swan Oval, 3.5L, £27.99
COST: 40.8p on low setting for 8 hours
THIS model is a relatively affordable option at £27.99, but it has one of the higher energy efficiency ratings, using 150 watts per hour.
There are four settings – auto, low, high heat and keep warm.
I worked out it could cost you 41p using it on a low heat for eight hours – although I’m confused about what the auto function is supposed to do.
Crock-Pot, 4.5L, £44.99,
COST: 65.28p on low setting for 8 hours
WHEN you think of slow cookers, Crock-Pot is the name that comes to mind – and this one is definitely the best in terms of functionality, with its digital screen and in-built timer.
While it’s the most expensive listed, it has a bigger 4.5L capacity, which is also the reason it is costlier to run at 240watts per hour.
But it means you can make meals ahead to freeze.
Salter Cosmos, 3.5L, £37.99
COST: 43.93p on low setting for 8 hours
WITH its sleek looks, you probably wouldn’t mind the Cosmos taking up space on your kitchen top.
It also has a handy setting which keeps cooked food warm until you are ready to eat.
But it’s one of the priciest appliances to buy and to run, clocking up 161.5 watts per hour.
So it’s up to you if you want some-thing pretty or prefer to save money.
Russell Hobbs Chalkboard, 3.5l, £25
COST: 41.07p on low setting for 8 hours
LIKE Salter’s model, Russell Hobbs’ slow cooker has a chalkboard on the side – perfect for writing notes for your spouse, scribbling a reminder of when to turn it off, or letting your family know the delicious grub you’re cooking for them.
It’s one of the more costly slow cookers to run, at 151 watts per hour, but it will still only cost 41p if you leave it on all day.
Daewoo Stainless Steel, 3.5L, £26.99
COST: 37.81p on low setting for 8 hours
DAEWOO’S slow cooker is a simple and affordable option.
Quite basic in looks, the stainless steel is still attractive enough and easy to keep clean.
It’s got three settings – low, medium and high – and a red light to tell you whether it is on or not.
At 139 watts per hour, this fuss-free option is very good value for money.
Salter Chalkboard 3.5L, £39.99
COST: 35.09p on low setting for 8 hours
THE quirky feature of this model is the chalkboard (chalks included), which allows you to write on the side what you are cooking.
Read More on The Sun
It also has three heat settings – low, warm and high – so you can cook as quickly or for as long as you like.
But what really matters is that when we tested the energy efficiency on low, this was the winner at just 129 watts per hour.