Millions of women could be forced to work longer if landmark state pension age court case is lost this week
ALMOST four million women could be forced to work longer or survive off smaller pensions if they lose a landmark court battle this week.
The Court of Appeal will today begin hearing evidence on whether it was fair for women born in the 1950's to have their state pension age increased without being given enough time to prepare for it.
Nearly 1.56million women born in the 1950s have been affected by the changes, according to House of Commons Library estimates, which has seen the state pension age for women jump from 60 to 66.
And altogether, the House of Commons Library estimates nearly 4million women have seen their state pension age rise from 60 - although for some it's been to less than age 66.
The shake-up was introduced by successive governments in 1995, 2007, and 2011 to bring women's state pension age in line with men and to account for the fact that people are both living and working for longer.
But women born in the 1950's claim the policy is discriminatory.
Next check retirement ages on workplace pension schemes - Aviva says this can massively impact your windfall once you enter your golden years.
For advice, you can contact for free online or on 0800 011 3797.
The case is being brought against the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions by two claimants - Julie Delve and Karen Glynn - alongside the support of campaign group BackTo60.
They last year lost their hearing at the High Court, but appealed the decision, which is why it's being heard today.
Campaigners are hoping for a final decision to be made tomorrow, although the court has yet to confirm when it will deliver its judgement.
They want to have their state pensions backdated to age 60; something campaign group Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) has also been calling for.
In a statement today, the BackTo60 campaign said: "There is no doubt that women have been discriminated against; not least because 4.6million men over a 35 year period - ending in 2018 - were awarded five years' national insurance contributions to enable them to retire five years early.
"While 3.8million #50sWomen were robbed and denied their right to retire at age 60, and pushed back to work for up to six years.
"There is no doubt in our minds that this is discrimination and we demand the return of our earned dues."
The Department for Work and Pensions declined to comment given litigation is ongoing.
Renny Biggins, head of retirement at savings body TISA, points out that women often struggle with smaller pensions as it is than men due to taking time off work to care for children or elderly parents.
He said: "It is undeniable that women are more likely to struggle when it comes to retirement income because of a number of factors which disproportionately impact their saving ability throughout life, such as taking breaks from work to care for children and elderly family members."
In future, state pension age will rise again to 68 for younger generations of both men and women.
READ MORE SUN STORIES
But some think tanks have suggested it should rise again to 70, and then again to 75 by 2035.
The state pension triple lock, which is used to calculate how much you should be paid, is also under threat.