From The Oscars’ Best Picture blunder to bagging the right flat, our experts share advice and the best deals on the high street
The Consumer Crew
Share
Every Saturday, The Consumer Crew are here to solve your problems.
Mel Hunter will take on readers’ consumer issues, Amanda Cable will give you the best advice for buying your dream home and Judge Rinder will tackle your legal woes.
Advertisement
Judge Rinder – The Sun’s legal expert
“AND the winner for Best Picture is La La Land,” announced Bonnie and Clyde, also known as Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway. Only they had got it wrong. Terribly wrong.
For those of you who — like me — stayed up to the small hours watching the Oscars this year (I did so despite my promise to boycott when Benedict Cumberbatch was robbed of his win for The Imitation Game), this was a nuclear-powered cringe moment.
Even the sanctimonious speeches didn’t come close to the bum-clenching horror of this monumental balls-up.
By the time the mistake had been rectified, the producers of La La Land had already thanked their families (etc etc) only for the golden statuettes to be unceremoniously grabbed off them.
It was hideously embarrassing for everybody involved, none more so than for the company in charge of overseeing the Oscar voting process — PriceWaterhouseCoopers.
This mega-firm has, however, been facing far more serious allegations of wrongdoing and negligence than this in recent years, which its has — so far — settled out of court.
Advertisement
In this case, its mistake has not only left the firm with egg on its face (how hard can it be to hand somebody the correct envelope?) but it has also exposed it to serious legal problems.
Without reading the Academy Award Rules, it’s hard to come to any firm conclusions on the extent of its liability but you can bet your bottom dollar that there will be law suits.
Not least because, once the winner of a competition is announced, this is often final unless there are clearly defined rules saying otherwise.
Advertisement
It seems to me that the appropriate remedy is to give both movies a joint award — and for the Academy to hand the vote-counting over to a local primary school who could probably do the job just as reliably.
Summing up
I USED to be a landlord and rented a flat to council tenants.
The council in their wisdom decided that tenants should receive rent money from them and pass it on to the landlord themselves. But my tenant stopped giving me rent, claiming I did not fix a leak promptly.
I let the council know he was not giving any rent money to me. They stopped the money going to the tenant but I have not received any money back from the council, even though the tenant stayed for more than nine months without paying rent.
The tenant has now left. Do I have a case to get arrears from the council? Stephen, Hackney, NE London
A - You did the right thing by requesting the Housing Benefit went directly to you.
These days most councils hand over rent money directly to landlords, especially in cases of tenants who are in receipt of other benefits.
The problem here is that I suspect the rent money destined for you may have been sent to your tenant by mistake.
If so, there is nothing you can do other than sue your tenant (although I doubt there would be much point in this).
On the other hand, if the council have simply failed to pay you, you are absolutely entitled to pursue this matter against them. Write to your local authority at once setting out the issue and ask for a reply within 28 days.
If they fail to respond, you may have to take this to the County Court.
Mr Rinder regrets he cannot answer questions personally. Answers intended as general guidance, they do not constitute legal advice and are not a substitute for obtaining independent legal advice.